Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy (LAVA-trial, study protocol)
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND Pelvic organ prolapse is a common health problem: the lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse by the age of 85 years is 19%. Pelvic organ prolapse has significant negative effects on a woman's quality of life. Worldwide, vaginal hysterectomy is the leading treatment method for patients with symptomatic uterovaginal prolapse. Several studies have shown that vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy and laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy are safe and effective alternatives in treating uterine descent. To date, it is unclear which of these techniques leads to the best operative result and the highest patient satisfaction. Therefore, we conducted the LAVA trial. METHODS The LAVA trial is a randomized controlled multicenter non-inferiority trial. The study compares laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher. The primary outcome of this study is surgical success of the apical compartment at 1 and 5 years follow-up. Secondary outcomes are subjective improvement on urogenital symptoms and quality of life (assessed by disease-specific and general quality of life questionnaires), complications following surgery, hospital stay, post-operative recovery, sexual functioning and costs-effectiveness. Evaluation will take place pre-operatively, and 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and annually till 60 months after surgery. Validated questionnaires will be used.Analysis will be performed according to the intention to treat principle. Based on comparable recurrence rates of 3% and a non-inferiority margin of 10%, 62 patients are needed in each arm to prove the hypothesis with a 95% confidence interval. DISCUSSION The LAVA trial is a randomized controlled multicenter non-inferiority trial that will provide evidence whether the efficacy of laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy is non-inferior to vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy in women with symptomatic uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher. TRIAL REGISTRATION Netherlands Trial Register (NTR): NTR4029.
منابع مشابه
Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial
OBJECTIVE To investigate whether uterus preserving vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy is non-inferior to vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse. DESIGN Multicentre randomised controlled non-blinded non-inferiority trial. SETTING 4 non-university teaching hospitals, the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS 208 healthy women with u...
متن کاملTreatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a randomized multicenter trial comparing sacrospinous fixation with vaginal hysterectomy (SAVE U trial)
BACKGROUND Pelvic organ prolapse is a common health problem, affecting up to 40% of parous women over 50 years old, with significant negative influence on quality of life. Vaginal hysterectomy is currently the leading treatment method for patients with symptomatic uterine prolapse. Several studies have shown that sacrospinous fixation in case of uterine prolapse is a safe and effective alternat...
متن کاملHysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a randomized controlled multicenter trial comparing laparo
1 Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Isala Zwolle, the Netherlands 2 Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Máxima Medisch Centrum Veldhoven, the Netherlands 3 Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gelre Ziekenhuizen Apeldoorn, the Netherlands 4 Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Spaarneziekenhuis Hoofddorp, the Netherlands 5 Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sint Lucas Andreas Ziekenhuis Amster...
متن کاملA Review of Surgical Treatment for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is common in women and may impair quality of life. Although vaginal pessary can relieve the symptoms and improve quality of life, women may opt for surgical treatment. This paper reviews some common surgical options for POP and their outcome. Anterior colporrhaphy is commonly performed for anterior compartment prolapse but the reported recurrence rate was high. Reinf...
متن کاملLaparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse, a randomized controlled trial: SALTO-2 trial, study protocol
BACKGROUND Hysterectomy is one of the most performed surgical procedures during lifetime. Almost 10 % of women who have had a hysterectomy because of prolapse symptoms, will visit a gynaecologist for a surgical correction of a vaginal vault prolapse thereafter. Vaginal vault prolapse can be corrected by many different surgical procedures. A Cochrane review comparing abdominal sacrocolpopexy to ...
متن کامل